Compass.
Model the capitation before you sign.
Full capitation puts you at risk for the whole medical book. Run the MLR, the risk corridor, and the stop-loss here — before the year, not after. No login required.
Shared savings Bundled payment Contract Legibility ↗
Population & revenue
Adjust any lever — results update live.
Revenue & cost
Capitation rate (PMPM)$1,000
Attributed lives10,000
Actual utilization (PMPM)$920
Your projected medical cost per member per month. Not a benchmark — your data.
Risk terms
MLR target ?85%
Risk corridor (±%) ?10.0%
Stop-loss attachment ?120%
Quality gates
Quality withhold5%
Quality score earned90%
Annual surplus / deficit
$0
MLR 0% $0 per member
The Bearing
Upside0.00
Downside0.00
Consequence0.00
Capitation waterfall
Sensitivity — across utilization scenarios
MLR and annual result as actual utilization runs hot or cold. Your base case is highlighted.
Utilization scenarioActual PMPMMLRSurplus / deficit
How this settles: Capitation revenue = rate × lives × 12. Medical cost = actual PMPM × lives × 12. The medical loss ratio is cost over revenue. Stop-loss reinsures any medical cost above the attachment point, so only the recognized cost flows downstream. The result is measured against the MLR target — recognized cost below the target is a surplus, above it is a deficit. The risk corridor caps that result on both sides at a percent of revenue, the quality withhold is earned back per the quality score on a surplus, and the remainder is the annual surplus or deficit. This is a planning model, not a contract; final settlement follows your executed agreement.
Sourced to a published reference AMBER — no public benchmark; negotiated or program-specific
Compass is a free planning tool. It does not store your inputs, give legal, actuarial, or accounting advice, or substitute for your executed agreement. Stop-loss is modeled as an aggregate attachment as a percent of revenue; specific (per-member) reinsurance behaves differently. The Bearing is a directional read of the modeled contract — it plots best-case surplus against worst-case deficit corridor exposure and is illustrative, not a recommendation.