Compass

VBC Financial Modeling
About Compass
Sign In
How to Use This Tool
Build a VBC financial model in 6 steps. Step 1: Choose your line of business and contract type. Step 2: Set population characteristics. Step 3: Define cost and utilization inputs. Step 4: Configure intervention assumptions. Step 5: Set risk corridor and financial terms. Step 6: Review your results dashboard. Toggle between Guide and Expert modes for more or less detail. Save models to the cloud, compare scenarios side-by-side, and export term sheets and PDF reports.

Contract Setup

Define the foundational parameters for your value-based arrangement.

+
The insurance product type. MA, Medicaid, commercial, and ACO each have different cost baselines and regulatory rules. This auto-populates all defaults.
+
Whether the provider shares only in savings (upside) or also absorbs losses (two-sided). Two-sided unlocks higher sharing rates but creates downside risk.
+
Members multiplied by months attributed. 10,000 members for 12 months = 120,000 MM. This is the denominator for every PMPM calculation. Under 5,000 lives produces statistically unreliable results.
+
Regional cost adjustment factor. Northeast and West Coast run 15-18% above national average. This adjusts the baseline so the model reflects local care costs.
+
Optional. Select a county to auto-populate the MA benchmark PMPM, geographic cost index, and average risk score from CMS county rate data. Overrides the geographic region selector above.
+
Performance years. Longer contracts (3-5 years) let care management programs mature. Year 1 rarely shows large returns; real value appears in years 2-3.
+
How members get assigned. Prospective locks the panel up front — you know who you're managing. Retrospective assigns after the fact, more accurate but harder to intervene.

Population Characteristics

Define the risk profile and demographics of your attributed population.

+ 1.00
How sick your population is relative to average (1.0 = average). Higher scores mean higher benchmarks and more room for savings. Undercoded populations get punished.
Range: 0.30 -- 4.00Benchmark: 1.00
+ 5.9%
CMS reduces MA risk scores by ~5.9% to account for coding intensity differences between MA and Fee-for-Service. This adjustment is applied before the risk-adjusted benchmark is calculated.
Range: 0% -- 10%MA Default: 5.9%
+ 72
Adjustable average age of the attributed population. Affects cost through an age-risk multiplier: younger populations cost less, older populations cost more. Ages below 45 reduce baseline by up to 15%; ages above 75 increase it by up to 20%.
Range: 18 -- 90LOB Default: 72
+ 52%
Percentage of attributed population that is female. Affects maternity cost allocation in the model. Higher female percentage in commercial populations increases maternity-related costs.
Range: 30% -- 70%LOB Default: 52%
+ 15%
Members without 12 months of claims history. They lack reliable risk scores, making their benchmark less accurate. High churn (>15%) adds volatility to savings calculations.
Range: 0% -- 50%Benchmark: 15%

Costs & Utilization

Set cost benchmarks and utilization rates for the target population.

?
Two formats supported:

Format A — Claims Detail:
claim_type,allowed_amount,member_months IP,8500000,120000 OP,6200000,120000 Professional,4800000,120000 ER,3100000,120000 Rx,5500000,120000 BH,1200000,120000 Post-Acute,2400000,120000
PMPM is calculated as allowed_amount / member_months.

Format B — Direct PMPM:
category,pmpm IP,350.00 OP,280.00 Professional,210.00 ER,95.00 Rx,180.00 BH,45.00 Post-Acute,55.00
Valid claim types: IP, OP, Professional, ER, Rx, BH, Post-Acute
Drop a CSV file here or click to browse
Supports claims detail or direct PMPM format
Warnings:
    + $1,100 PMPM
    If you know your actual TCOC, enter it here to override the calculated estimate. This is the most important number in the model — use real data when available.
    $100 -- $3,000Defaults to LOB benchmark. Adjust to match your known TCOC.
    Typical ranges: MA $900--1,200 · Commercial $400--700 · Medicaid $300--500 · DSNP $1,200--1,800
    +
    The pricing framework for unit costs. Most commercial contracts express rates as a percentage of Medicare. This determines the dollar value of every utilization unit.
    + 100%
    Hospital reimbursement as % of Medicare rates. Commercial typically pays 180-250%. Higher percentages mean higher benchmarks — more room for savings but payer is already overpaying.
    50% -- 400%MA Benchmark: 100%
    + 100%
    Physician reimbursement as % of Medicare. Commercial typically pays 130-180%. Combined with visit rates, this builds the professional services cost baseline.
    50% -- 300%MA Benchmark: 100%
    + 65
    Inpatient admissions per 1,000 members annually. Usually the largest cost category. Reducing admits by 10% on a large book can generate millions in savings.
    10 -- 200MA Benchmark: 65
    National average LOS: 4.5 days
    + 350
    Emergency visits per 1,000 annually. High ER rates signal primary care access gaps and represent redirection savings opportunity.
    50 -- 800MA Benchmark: 350
    + 4200
    Primary care visits per 1,000. Higher PCP utilization correlates with lower ER and IP use. More PCP visits is usually the goal, not something to reduce.
    1,000 -- 10,000MA Benchmark: 4,200
    + 2800
    Specialty visits per 1,000. Referral management and center-of-excellence routing can reduce specialist spend without cutting access.
    500 -- 8,000MA Benchmark: 2,800
    + 50%
    Portion of pharmacy spend on specialty drugs. Specialty is 2% of scripts but 50%+ of Rx cost. This dramatically affects total cost projections.
    10% -- 80%Benchmark: 50%
    + 7.5%
    Annual medical cost increase rate. Trend compounds across multi-year contracts. Higher trend in the benchmark favors providers; lower trend favors payers.
    0% -- 15%Industry Avg: 7.5%
    + 9.0%
    Annual pharmacy cost increase. Often exceeds medical trend due to specialty pricing. If pharmacy is carved in, high Rx trend can erase medical savings.
    0% -- 20%Industry Avg: 9.0%
    Use uniform trend
    7.5%
    0% -- 20%Typical: 8-10%
    7.5%
    0% -- 20%Typical: 7-9%
    7.5%
    0% -- 20%Typical: 4-6%
    7.5%
    0% -- 20%Typical: 10-12%
    7.5%
    0% -- 20%Typical: 5-7%
    7.5%
    0% -- 20%Typical: 6-8%
    +
    Whether pharmacy is included in or excluded from the benchmark. Carving in gives more levers but more exposure. Carving out simplifies the model.
    Pharmacy Carved In
    + 20%
    Percentage of pharmacy spend offset by manufacturer rebates. Reduces the Rx PMPM component. Defaults vary by LOB: ~20% for commercial, ~15% for MA, 0% for Medicaid FFS. Only active when pharmacy is carved in.
    0% -- 50%Commercial default: 20%

    Contract Terms

    Define the financial terms of the shared savings/risk arrangement.

    + 3.0%
    Projected % by which actual costs will beat the benchmark. Be conservative year 1. Programs projecting 5%+ savings in year 1 are usually wrong.
    0% -- 25%Y1 Typical: 2-4%
    + 50%
    % of savings the provider keeps. Higher shares compensate for care management investment. Meaningless without understanding the MSR and quality gate underneath.
    0% -- 100%Typical: 50%
    + 2.0%
    Minimum savings threshold before sharing begins. A 2% MSR on $100M means the first $2M in savings generates zero payout. Exists to filter statistical noise from real performance.
    0% -- 10%CMS MSSP: 2-3.9%
    + 40%
    In two-sided contracts, the % of losses the provider absorbs when costs exceed benchmark. Should be proportional to savings share — if you keep 50% of wins, 40% of losses is fair.
    0% -- 100%Typical: 30-50%
    + 10%
    Cap on provider losses as % of benchmark. Without a cap, one bad year can bankrupt a practice. Always negotiate a cap.
    0% -- 50% of benchmarkTypical: 5-15%
    + 25%
    Cap on provider earnings as % of gross savings. Limits windfall payouts. Resist caps in negotiation — if you generated the savings, why cap your reward?
    0% -- 100% of gross savingsTypical: 20-30%
    + $250K
    Claim cost threshold above which individual members are excluded from the savings calculation. Protects against catastrophic outliers. Lower truncation favors providers.
    $50K -- $2MTypical: $200-300K
    +
    How quality affects the financial settlement. Binary = all-or-nothing. Sliding = partial credit. ACO = CMS composite. Never accept binary if you can get sliding — the cliff effect is devastating.
    Binary
    Sliding Scale
    + 5%
    % of earnings held back pending quality verification. Keep at 3-5%. Above 5%, you're paying a quality tax that makes economics less attractive than they appear.
    0% -- 20%Typical: 3-5%
    + $15
    Per-member reinsurance cost that caps catastrophic loss exposure. In two-sided contracts, this isn't optional — it's survival.
    $0 -- $50Default: $15
    + 98%
    % of claims received at settlement time. 98% means 2% are still processing. Settling too early (before 6+ months runout) overstates savings.
    90% -- 100%Default: 98% (actuarially conservative)
    + $8
    Your investment in care coordination, population health, and clinical infrastructure. This reduces your net margin from savings. Model it honestly.
    $0 -- $30Default: $8
    + $35
    Program administration costs — analytics, reporting, compliance, legal. Often underestimated. If you don't model it, the P&L surprises you.
    $10 -- $75Default: $35
    + 0.5%
    Additional savings rate per year in multi-year contracts. Reflects care management maturation. Justifies longer contract terms.
    0% -- 2%Added to savings rate each year in multi-year projections
    + 5%
    Discount rate for net present value calculations on multi-year contracts. Reflects the time value of money. Higher rates reduce the present value of future savings. Only applies to contracts longer than 1 year.
    3% -- 10%Default: 5%
    +
    Whether the benchmark resets based on prior year actual costs. Rebasing punishes success — reduces cumulative savings by ~30% in years 2+. Fight it in negotiation.
    When on, reduces cumulative savings by ~30% in years 2+ as benchmark resets to prior actuals
    +
    When financial settlement occurs. Shared savings reconciliation typically happens 18 months after the performance year starts. Bundled payments reconcile quarterly. Capitation reconciles monthly with annual true-up.

    Quality Metrics

    Define quality performance expectations and bonus structures.

    + 3.5
    Your current quality performance before the VBC contract. The gap between baseline and target determines how much improvement is needed to unlock payments.
    1.0 -- 5.0 StarsBenchmark: 3.5
    + 4.0
    The threshold required for full financial settlement. Set realistically — achievable targets that escalate over the contract term.
    1.0 -- 5.0 StarsThreshold: 4.0
    + 2.0%
    Additional money for exceptional quality, as % of TCOC. Bonus pools cost the payer nothing unless quality improves — easier to negotiate than higher savings shares.
    0% -- 10%Typical: 1-3%
    +
    MA only. 5% premium rebate from CMS for 4.0+ Stars plans. If you're driving Stars improvement, get contractual credit for it.
    5% rebate at 4.0+ Stars

    Results Dashboard

    Projected financial outcomes for Year 1 of the value-based arrangement.

    Scenario 1: Empty
    Scenario 2: Empty
    Scenario 3: Empty

    Sensitivity Analysis

    Savings Waterfall

    Cost by Service Category

    Shared Savings Distribution

    Quality-Adjusted Financials

    MLR Impact

    Provider P&L View

    Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Monte Carlo Simulation

    Want to discuss this model with an advisor?

    We'll review your assumptions and help you negotiate terms.

    Compass is built by Cadence · Learn about structured continuation governance →

    Pricing

    Model for free. Scale when you need to.

    Free

    $0

    • 1 line of business
    • 3 cloud saves
    • PDF export
    • Sensitivity analysis
    • Term sheet generation

    No credit card required.

    Most Popular

    Pro

    $99/mo

    • All 8 lines of business
    • Unlimited cloud saves
    • Scenario comparison
    • Team sharing
    • Monte Carlo PSA
    • Priority support

    Enterprise

    $499/mo

    • Everything in Pro
    • API access
    • White-label reports
    • SSO / SAML
    • Custom benchmarks
    • Dedicated onboarding